Beyond the Diagnosis: Overcoming Victim Mentality After Cancer

I conducted an interview with a young cancer patient. Upon discovering her affliction, she was under the age of thirty. The prime years of her existence had barely commenced. One might naturally ponder: “Why has this befallen me?” Yet, it transpired merely by chance. She abstains from smoking or imbibing alcohol, harbors no deleterious habits, and boasts no familial predisposition to the malady, yet cancer still besieged her. Subsequent to her condition stabilizing, her return to the workplace was greeted by the company, albeit her colleagues discerned a discernible alteration in her demeanor. On one occasion, she placed a document requiring amendment at the forefront of the reception desk. Traditionally, the reception desk undertook the dispatch of express parcels for all personnel, hence, they dispatched it for her as well – with the address clearly affixed, was it still amiss? Consequently, upon realizing that the express delivery had reached its destination, her initial reaction was one of persecution. She conjectured that the reception desk employed this stratagem to coerce her resignation. She surmised that the company’s ostensible willingness to retain her was mere pretense.

The immediate acceptance of the harsh reality of cancer’s affliction eludes comprehension. This young patient perceived her fate as already woefully dire, with scant room for felicity, yet numerous minor adversities continued to encroach upon this limited space.

If an individual endures childhood maltreatment, the tendency may persist into adulthood. They are inclined to perceive themselves as perpetual targets, irrespective of circumstance or locale. This cognitive pattern arises from assimilating and internalizing all past negative experiences into a deleterious mindset.

An extreme exemplar warrants mention: “Munchausen syndrome.” This denotes a mental ailment characterized by fabricating or exaggerating symptoms of illness, feigning sickness, or even inflicting harm upon oneself or others to elicit sympathy. It manifests in two variants: spontaneous and by proxy. In 2015, a notorious incident unfolded in Missouri, USA, constituting an extreme case of Munchausen syndrome by proxy. The incident, later dramatized in the television series “Bad Deeds,” garnered substantial attention. In this tragedy, the model mother Didi was discovered tragically deceased at home. Investigations revealed that Didi met her demise at the hands of her daughter’s boyfriend while her 23-year-old daughter, “Little Rose,” bore witness. Initially confounding, as Little Rose had purportedly been infirm since infancy, reliant on a wheelchair for mobility. For over two decades, she purportedly endured a litany of afflictions, including sleep apnea, chromosomal anomalies, muscular dystrophy, leukemia, cancer, sensory degradation, and dementia. However, subsequent scrutiny prior to her incarceration unveiled normal physiological parameters, indicative of robust health. Notwithstanding, under her mother’s meticulous care, she assumed the role of a patient for over two decades.

Whilst an extreme instance, researchers increasingly acknowledge the propensity of individuals to assume a victim mentality in various circumstances. Cloaked in victimhood, one garners sympathy, morally subjugates others, and may even justify hostility towards others. Within the victim’s psyche, adversity begets resentment. Disparaging remarks are readily comprehended; failure to do so implies deficiency on the part of the interlocutor.

Victimhood proliferates within the online realm. Admitting fallibility and assuming accountability prove arduous for many. Given the attendant benefits, why relinquish victimhood? Is venting one’s ire onto others not a salutary outlet? Are we not advised against internal strife?

This mindset, detrimental and devoid of merit, pertains to those who revel in negativity and impose it upon others. They resign themselves to a fatalistic worldview, attributing misfortune to external factors. Change is deemed futile, absolving oneself of responsibility, thereby relinquishing agency.

When one embraces victimhood, they forfeit agency over their emotional state. External forces dictate their sentiments, albeit in exchange for fleeting sympathy. This transaction invariably incurs a loss.

Misfortune befalls all, prompting the ubiquitous refrain: “Misfortune always finds me,” “No one extends compassion towards me.” Each tribulation reinforces these convictions. I, too, weathered the twin vicissitudes of professional setback and romantic dissolution. Reflecting, I harbored myriad negative ruminations during that epoch. Internal dialogues and pragmatic challenges fed into each other, culminating in a pernicious notion: impending calamity warrants precipitous arrival.

Amidst adversity, identifying one’s own culpability proves paramount. Responsibility necessitates redefinition. Even amidst termination, one may apportion a modicum of blame upon oneself, affirming agency in confronting life’s vicissitudes.

By actively selecting one’s emotional response to adversity, the path to convalescence unfolds.

error: Content is protected !!